Open main menu

Bulbapedia β

Changes

User talk:Abcboy

1,358 bytes added, 23 October
Bulbapedia block appeal: new section
 
I understand deleting the talk page, but why delete the entire article? I'm pretty sure people who advocate the ship might have something to say about it. [[User:GrammarFreak01|GrammarFreak01]] ([[User talk:GrammarFreak01|talk]]) 21:22, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
 
== GalarPony ==
Hey you forgot to unblock me when Galar Ponyta was “confirmed”. I had to wait 2 weeks for no reason. Thanks a lot. {{unsigned|GalarPony}}
:You were blocked because you were leaving rude and insulting messages to other users in violation of the {{bp|code of conduct}}, not because Galarian Ponyta was unconfirmed. --[[User:Abcboy|Abcboy]] ([[User talk:Abcboy|talk]]) 15:17, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
 
== Bulbapedia block appeal ==
 
Dear abcboy, dear Editorial Board,
 
per the {{bp|Blocking policy}}, I am hereby appealing Pumpkinking's recent one-month block issued by Force Fire.
 
I laid out reasons for why I request this block be re-evaluated at Force Fire's talk page. I'm concerned that ForceFire's lack of self reflection does not enable them to properly evaluate matters on their own, in particular when possibly combined with a personal bias (as hinted at by their response, as well as simply by them being one party in this dispute).
 
Furthermore, I would like you to mediate as far as the content level of that discussion is concerned, i.e. all possible blockable offense aside. Personally, I'd prefer there be no hidden note at all, but if there must, it should be reasonable (e.g., much like after Pumpkinking's rewording).
 
Sincerly, [[User:Nescientist|Nescientist]] ([[User talk:Nescientist|talk]]) 19:05, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
editlock-exempt
4,320
edits