13,668
edits
Talk:Ash's Rowlet: Difference between revisions
→Evolved/NFE
Force Fire (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
I have no interest in whether the actual trivium goes on the page or not, but Force Fire, you are completely and totally wrong. How, exactly, do you think Rowlet being the only unevolved somehow implies it's the only not-fully-evolved? Walk me through it, because your logic makes no sense. If anything, the inverse is closer to being true (but still doesn't quite work without prior knowledge). [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 05:28, 21 October 2019 (UTC) | I have no interest in whether the actual trivium goes on the page or not, but Force Fire, you are completely and totally wrong. How, exactly, do you think Rowlet being the only unevolved somehow implies it's the only not-fully-evolved? Walk me through it, because your logic makes no sense. If anything, the inverse is closer to being true (but still doesn't quite work without prior knowledge). [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 05:28, 21 October 2019 (UTC) | ||
:What does Torracat, or any other mid stager not being fully evolved, have anything to do with the reasoning? A Pokémon can't be fully evolved if it hasn't evolved in the first place.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#EBC600">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#EBC600">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#D8B600">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#D8B600">ire</span>]] 05:31, 21 October 2019 (UTC) | :What does Torracat, or any other mid stager not being fully evolved, have anything to do with the reasoning? A Pokémon can't be fully evolved if it hasn't evolved in the first place.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#EBC600">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#EBC600">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#D8B600">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#D8B600">ire</span>]] 05:31, 21 October 2019 (UTC) | ||
::You are not understanding what I am saying. I don't think you even understand what ''you'' are saying. Let me try to make it clear. | |||
::Other people are trying to add the trivium "Rowlet is the only Pokemon on Ash's Alola team '''that has not evolved''', and the only one '''that is not fully evolved'''. Let us call these Claim 1 and Claim 2, respectively. | |||
::You have reverted this, saying that Claim 1 implies Claim 2. But that's completely wrong and a lapse in logic. | |||
::If Claim 1 is true, Claim 2 can '''either''' be true (if all others are fully evolved) or false (if both Rowlet and somebody else are not fully evolved). | |||
::So there is no logical way to conclude Claim 1's truth automatically means Claim 2 is also true. You need more information than that. It doesn't just "imply" it automatically. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 05:44, 21 October 2019 (UTC) | |||