764
edits
Talk:Treecko (Pokémon): Difference between revisions
m
→Tail
(→Tail: new section) |
MarioMiner (talk | contribs) m (→Tail) |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
Anyone else notice how, prior to gen VI, Treecko's tail was a thick solid tail with two small nubs at the tip, but now its two separate tails that move on their own? Trivia or no?--[[User:Lycos Ex Mortis|Lycos Ex Mortis]] ([[User talk:Lycos Ex Mortis|talk]]) 03:46, 28 February 2015 (UTC) | Anyone else notice how, prior to gen VI, Treecko's tail was a thick solid tail with two small nubs at the tip, but now its two separate tails that move on their own? Trivia or no?--[[User:Lycos Ex Mortis|Lycos Ex Mortis]] ([[User talk:Lycos Ex Mortis|talk]]) 03:46, 28 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
== Artwork (applies to Torchic and Mudkip as well) == | |||
Is there a particular reason that we are using the Ruby and Sapphire Sugimori art for the infobox(es)? With other Pokémon with redone artwork (FRLG saw new art for all Gen 1 Pokémon, and the same for Gen 2 with HGSS) we use the most recent artwork, but for these starters (as well as Rayquaza, but there are significant design differences between Sugimori's art of Rayquaza that could obscure some details, so I can understand that) we are using artwork from RS, not even Emerald, which has its own, when ORAS did result in new art for these starters. Ultimately, it doesn't matter much to me, beyond the fact that I think the more recent artwork looks nicer (more aesthetically pleasing coloring and light/shadow decisions, at least to me, and more dynamic poses) and it's not a big deal if we can't, I'm just curious as to why we can't. [[User:MarioMiner|MarioMiner]] ([[User talk:MarioMiner|talk]]) 03:37, 16 August 2019 (UTC) | |||