855
edits
Talk:Cut (move): Difference between revisions
→Split
(→Split) |
Dannyboy601 (talk | contribs) (→Split) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:Good point. Not a bad idea. --[[User:FinnishPokéFan92|FinnishPokéFan92]] ([[User talk:FinnishPokéFan92|talk]]) 14:44, 8 June 2019 (UTC) | :Good point. Not a bad idea. --[[User:FinnishPokéFan92|FinnishPokéFan92]] ([[User talk:FinnishPokéFan92|talk]]) 14:44, 8 June 2019 (UTC) | ||
::I have nothing against the split, but I wonder if we would have enough information to fill a whole page about cuttable plants. Other than the locations of the trees and bushes, there doesn't seem to be much more, because unlike the breakable rocks and headbutt trees, you can't find any Pokémon or items by cutting them. However, if we get enough content for the page, I'm all for it. --[[User:Suic12-|Suic]] ([[User talk:Suic12-|talk]]) 17:33, 8 June 2019 (UTC) | ::I have nothing against the split, but I wonder if we would have enough information to fill a whole page about cuttable plants. Other than the locations of the trees and bushes, there doesn't seem to be much more, because unlike the breakable rocks and headbutt trees, you can't find any Pokémon or items by cutting them. However, if we get enough content for the page, I'm all for it. --[[User:Suic12-|Suic]] ([[User talk:Suic12-|talk]]) 17:33, 8 June 2019 (UTC) | ||
:::I think that a list of locations would be enough, honestly. It's better than having no page at all, in which case we'd either have to continue not listing the locations anywhere, or list them on this page, which would take up a lot of space. ~ [[User:Dannyboy601|Dannyboy601]] ([[User talk:Dannyboy601|talk]]) 02:02, 9 June 2019 (UTC) | |||