138
edits
Talk:ROM hack: Difference between revisions
→Cease and Desist games
(→Cease and Desist games: new section) |
|||
| Line 485: | Line 485: | ||
* ''It is a significant step forward in terms of hack development as a whole''. See above. | * ''It is a significant step forward in terms of hack development as a whole''. See above. | ||
I would say the Rijon games should definitely go in. Sadly, I'm not as well versed with Uranium, so I can't say much, other than it is definitely well known, with its long development time, several Let's Plays, and new Fakemon. I just wanted to know if there was any legal reason they weren't given their own sections in the first place before I added them.[[User:Iml908|Iml908]] ([[User talk:Iml908|talk]]) 03:41, 27 August 2018 (UTC) | I would say the Rijon games should definitely go in. Sadly, I'm not as well versed with Uranium, so I can't say much, other than it is definitely well known, with its long development time, several Let's Plays, and new Fakemon. I just wanted to know if there was any legal reason they weren't given their own sections in the first place before I added them.[[User:Iml908|Iml908]] ([[User talk:Iml908|talk]]) 03:41, 27 August 2018 (UTC) | ||
:I'm personally not all that familiar with these games, but I certainly agree that Brown should be on there. It's even mentioned in the wiki article... just not on the list. [[User:Dannyjenn|D]] ([[User talk:Dannyjenn|talk]]) 12:41, 12 February 2019 (UTC) | |||