22,150
edits
User talk:Blazingfist: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Blazingfist (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 609: | Line 609: | ||
::I get what he means, he wants to present character's (non notable) Pokémon the way we present the recurring Pokémon on their page. In my opinion, I see it as simply trying to circumvent the notability requirements. It doesn't matter if they appear multiple times, if they didn't do anything major, then they are not worth expanding. Also, it's going to make the pages extremely bloated and long if we were to do that. If there are calls to split the recurring Pokémon page, then clearly doing it on character articles isn't going to work.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#EBC600">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#EBC600">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#D8B600">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#D8B600">ire</span>]] 15:47, 11 January 2019 (UTC) | ::I get what he means, he wants to present character's (non notable) Pokémon the way we present the recurring Pokémon on their page. In my opinion, I see it as simply trying to circumvent the notability requirements. It doesn't matter if they appear multiple times, if they didn't do anything major, then they are not worth expanding. Also, it's going to make the pages extremely bloated and long if we were to do that. If there are calls to split the recurring Pokémon page, then clearly doing it on character articles isn't going to work.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#EBC600">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#EBC600">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#D8B600">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#D8B600">ire</span>]] 15:47, 11 January 2019 (UTC) | ||
:::Fair enough, thought it a bit silly but thought I would check--[[User:BigDocFan|BigDocFan]] ([[User talk:BigDocFan|talk]]) 15:53, 11 January 2019 (UTC) | :::Fair enough, thought it a bit silly but thought I would check--[[User:BigDocFan|BigDocFan]] ([[User talk:BigDocFan|talk]]) 15:53, 11 January 2019 (UTC) | ||
::::Ah, I understand now. I agree that isn't the best idea. Seems like a lot of work and space used for Pokémon that aren't that notable in the end. I think the current templates used for such Pokémon suffice. <span style="font-family:Arial Black"><span style="color:Red">☼ Blazing</span>[[User talk:Blazingfist|<span style="color:red">Fist ☼</span>]]</span> 15:56, 11 January 2019 (UTC) | |||