Talk:Leaf (game): Difference between revisions

Talk:Leaf (game) (view source)

Revision as of 03:20, 22 December 2018

93 bytes added , 22 December 2018

no edit summary

LavaringX

247

edits

Revision as of 03:18, 22 December 2018 (view source) LavaringX (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 03:20, 22 December 2018 (view source) LavaringX (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 411:		Line 411:
	::I don't really see the point in making a page split for two iterations of the same character IMO. It's much simpler and easier to follow to keep all the information on her on one page. Let's just change everything to Green apart from references to the figure. --[[User:Celadonkey\|Celadonkey]] 02:52, 22 December 2018 (UTC)		::I don't really see the point in making a page split for two iterations of the same character IMO. It's much simpler and easier to follow to keep all the information on her on one page. Let's just change everything to Green apart from references to the figure. --[[User:Celadonkey\|Celadonkey]] 02:52, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

	:::We do not have PROOF that they are the same character, but even that's besides the point. You are also ignoring that we resolved this issue with an earlier compromise (make one page but refer to her as "Leaf" in the context of FRLG) and people keep bringing the topic back up to try and push their view. The reason being that Green is clearly an attempt to revive the old unused character, while Leaf may or may not be a separate thing entirely. If it was "so obvious" they were the same character the whole time, why keep information about the unused character on a separate page until the release of LGPE, which doesn't prove anything other than to reintroduce the idea of the character of Green?		:::We do not have PROOF that they are the same character, but even that's besides the point. You are also ignoring that we resolved this issue with an earlier compromise (make one page but refer to her as "Leaf" in the context of FRLG) and people keep bringing the topic back up to try and push their view. The reason being that Green is clearly an attempt to revive the old unused character, while Leaf may or may not be a separate thing entirely. If it was "so obvious" they were the same character the whole time, why keep information about the unused character on a separate page until the release of LGPE, which doesn't prove anything other than to reintroduce the idea of the character of Green? --[[User:LavaringX\|LavaringX]] ([[User talk:LavaringX\|talk]]) 03:20, 22 December 2018 (UTC)