183
edits
Talk:Leaf (game): Difference between revisions
→Leaf now called Green in Pokémon Let's Go?
| Line 252: | Line 252: | ||
:Unless we see official confirmation that the LGPE character is the same character we currently call Leaf (alternate timelines nonwithstanding), LGPE is unlikely to affect this page's name. I doubt being "the female Gen I trainer" is enough to count as Leaf, because it would be similar to the {{ga|Kris}}/{{ga|Lyra}} situation. [[User:Bwburke94|bwburke94]] ([[User talk:Bwburke94|talk]]) 01:31, 13 November 2018 (UTC) | :Unless we see official confirmation that the LGPE character is the same character we currently call Leaf (alternate timelines nonwithstanding), LGPE is unlikely to affect this page's name. I doubt being "the female Gen I trainer" is enough to count as Leaf, because it would be similar to the {{ga|Kris}}/{{ga|Lyra}} situation. [[User:Bwburke94|bwburke94]] ([[User talk:Bwburke94|talk]]) 01:31, 13 November 2018 (UTC) | ||
::Well, she is confirmed to be called Green in-game as seen in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FPwtcdhlL3Q [[User:Sucoleo|Sucoleo]] ([[User talk:Sucoleo|talk]]) 08:41, 15 November 2018 (UTC) | ::Well, she is confirmed to be called Green in-game as seen in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FPwtcdhlL3Q [[User:Sucoleo|Sucoleo]] ([[User talk:Sucoleo|talk]]) 08:41, 15 November 2018 (UTC) | ||
:::Darn... had she be named Leaf like the figurine, that would have been more wise of Pokémon as to alleviate a bit the whole Blue/Green shenanigans that the fandom has been stuck with for years. I guess game-npc name takes preference over a figurine assigned name in this case I suppose...--[[User:DanyyelTR|DanyyelTR]] ([[User talk:DanyyelTR|talk]]) 19:08, 15 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
:::Don't be funny. The game literally slaps us in the face that she's one and the same, by giving her an intermediate design between her Gen I and Gen III self. Don't grasp at straws. --[[User:Maxim|Maxim]] ([[User talk:Maxim|talk]]) 09:34, 15 November 2018 (UTC) | :::Don't be funny. The game literally slaps us in the face that she's one and the same, by giving her an intermediate design between her Gen I and Gen III self. Don't grasp at straws. --[[User:Maxim|Maxim]] ([[User talk:Maxim|talk]]) 09:34, 15 November 2018 (UTC) | ||
::::I agree that this is definitely meant to be the same character. Her top is clearly just inverted colours of her FRLG design, she's wearing shorts instead of a skirt and not wearing a hat. This change in design seems to be more of a difference like {{ga|May}} between her RSE and ORAS design than a {{ga|Kris}}/{{ga|Lyra}} difference. [[User:Tarawl|Tarawl]] ([[User talk:Tarawl|talk]]) 15:27, 15 November 2018 (UTC) | ::::I agree that this is definitely meant to be the same character. Her top is clearly just inverted colours of her FRLG design, she's wearing shorts instead of a skirt and not wearing a hat. This change in design seems to be more of a difference like {{ga|May}} between her RSE and ORAS design than a {{ga|Kris}}/{{ga|Lyra}} difference. [[User:Tarawl|Tarawl]] ([[User talk:Tarawl|talk]]) 15:27, 15 November 2018 (UTC) | ||
:::::Whether Blue/Leaf is the same character or not, this does not affect Leaf as the official name of FRLG female protagonist. Yea, this is like Kris/Lyra case. Some people think that they are the same character, and Some people don’t. And Red(original/remake), Gold/Ethan, Elio(SM/USUM) and Selene(SM/USUM) are the same case also, although Bulbapedia has different treatments for them each. [[User:E9310103838|E9310103838]] ([[User talk:E9310103838|talk]]) 16:10, 15 November 2018 (UTC) | :::::Whether Blue/Leaf is the same character or not, this does not affect Leaf as the official name of FRLG female protagonist. Yea, this is like Kris/Lyra case. Some people think that they are the same character, and Some people don’t. And Red(original/remake), Gold/Ethan, Elio(SM/USUM) and Selene(SM/USUM) are the same case also, although Bulbapedia has different treatments for them each. [[User:E9310103838|E9310103838]] ([[User talk:E9310103838|talk]]) 16:10, 15 November 2018 (UTC) | ||
::::::That's some pomfed logic to me. If it wasn't for the Kotobukiya figure, this issue would be non-existant. Different names for nameable characters exist, like they always did. There's absolutely no reason to split articles. --[[User:Maxim|Maxim]] ([[User talk:Maxim|talk]]) 18:00, 15 November 2018 (UTC) | ::::::That's some pomfed logic to me. If it wasn't for the Kotobukiya figure, this issue would be non-existant. Different names for nameable characters exist, like they always did. There's absolutely no reason to split articles. --[[User:Maxim|Maxim]] ([[User talk:Maxim|talk]]) 18:00, 15 November 2018 (UTC) | ||