Difference between revisions of "Talk:List of Pokémon by index number (Generation I)"

:It confirms that Missingno. are just deleted Pokémon, but that uses this as a source, so we would be using Bulbapedia as a source for itself. I would recommend trivia here and on Missingno.'s page. And I think that there may be a few problems with the non-Missingno. glitch Pokémon in Generation II—I don't think it is quite accurate; someone should check it. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 10:54, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
::Plus, for reasons pointed out by me and others in that very topic, the parts of that theory that refer to this page are probably false (except that there are 39 Missingnos.) --[[User:HeroicJay|HeroicJay]] 21:51, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
:::The problem I have with this is that this bulbapedia article links to Smogon Forums as a source and the specified page on Smogon Forums links back to this article... Neither page is a valid source and therefore hte information about their being originally 190 in Red/Blue should not be included unless a valid source can be found. It even says on the link Smogon Forums page that it's speculation based on the thoughts of the original poster on that forum. That means its not verified information and should be removed until a verified source can be found.[[User:DarienLeonhart|DarienLeonhart]] ([[User talk:DarienLeonhart|talk]]) 04:44, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
== Split glitch Pokemon columns for RB versus Y? ==