Talk:Umbreon (Pokémon): Difference between revisions

Line 135: Line 135:
:::::The japanese, the original, name for the 'Dark type' is 'Evil type'. It doesn't need to be on the entries, it's right on its typing.  
:::::The japanese, the original, name for the 'Dark type' is 'Evil type'. It doesn't need to be on the entries, it's right on its typing.  
:::::Although vague, the Set Animal also shares some really unusual details to Umbreon such as the always erected ears and tail. And the design differences could all be taken from the hare and fox previously on the origin. I know it may not be much, but Umbreon has always been an enigmatic creature and this somewhat can fill a few holes in its possible origin. All we had so far was the generic black cat and the moon rabbit (which doesn't explain the typing and most of its design), so, can't we just consider this as a possible one?
:::::Although vague, the Set Animal also shares some really unusual details to Umbreon such as the always erected ears and tail. And the design differences could all be taken from the hare and fox previously on the origin. I know it may not be much, but Umbreon has always been an enigmatic creature and this somewhat can fill a few holes in its possible origin. All we had so far was the generic black cat and the moon rabbit (which doesn't explain the typing and most of its design), so, can't we just consider this as a possible one?
:::::EDIT: I guess that's a no. rip
:::::[[User:ExLight|ExLight]] ([[User talk:ExLight|talk]]) 04:38, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
:::::[[User:ExLight|ExLight]] ([[User talk:ExLight|talk]]) 04:38, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
316

edits