Talk:MissingNo./Archive 1: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 175: Line 175:


It's a glitch Pokémon, it's there, it's in the game, you can not deny that. There is no problem in having biology for glitch Pokémon, because they are still actual Pokémon. What do you have against game location of Missingno.? Or it's special abilities? There is no problem with them being there. [[User:GlinnMgraw|<span style="color:#0000FF;">Glinn</span>]][[Image:Ani202MS.gif|32px]] 03:47, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
It's a glitch Pokémon, it's there, it's in the game, you can not deny that. There is no problem in having biology for glitch Pokémon, because they are still actual Pokémon. What do you have against game location of Missingno.? Or it's special abilities? There is no problem with them being there. [[User:GlinnMgraw|<span style="color:#0000FF;">Glinn</span>]][[Image:Ani202MS.gif|32px]] 03:47, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
:Nintendo does not consider it a Pokémon, and consensus seems to be that we don't either. We don't need a "gender differences" section for a (glitch) Pokémon that has no gender. The info in the "Special abilities" section repeated what is said in [[Rare Candy cheat]], as did "Habitat". [[Image:Ani201QuMS.gif]] '''<code>[[User:Abwayax|abwayax]] ([[User talk:Abwayax|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Abwayax|c]])</code>''' [[Image:Ani201ExMS.gif]] 03:52, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
157

edits