13,668
edits
Talk:Kangaskhan (Pokémon): Difference between revisions
→Are these not worth mentioning?
TheFatPanda (talk | contribs) (→Are these not worth mentioning?: new section) |
|||
| Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
*The mother and baby seem to act in unison in Pokémon-Amie/Refresh, both reacting to being petted, regardless of which is actually getting the physical contact, and both making the "eating" animation when being fed, no matter which one is doing the actual consumption. | *The mother and baby seem to act in unison in Pokémon-Amie/Refresh, both reacting to being petted, regardless of which is actually getting the physical contact, and both making the "eating" animation when being fed, no matter which one is doing the actual consumption. | ||
[[User:TheFatPanda|TheFatPanda]] ([[User talk:TheFatPanda|talk]]) 12:21, 6 October 2017 (UTC) | [[User:TheFatPanda|TheFatPanda]] ([[User talk:TheFatPanda|talk]]) 12:21, 6 October 2017 (UTC) | ||
:The former should be self-evident from the fact that there isn't a link anywhere to a species page for the baby; it doesn't need to be stated explicitly, IMO. As for the latter, I imagine it might be worth a trivium, but idk what the staff will say. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 19:38, 6 October 2017 (UTC) | |||