Talk:Master Ball: Difference between revisions

(→‎Sortable table?: new section)
Line 33: Line 33:


Is there a compelling reason the "Master Ball locations" table is sortable? There really doesn't seem to be any reason to sort it except in chronological order by generation/game, which we're already doing by default, making the sortability pretty much useless, since all the other columns are random factoids that a person would have no reason to want to see in alphabetical order. Plus, if we got rid of the sortability, we could vertically merge the generation and game cells, which I think would look much more aesthetically pleasing. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 15:00, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Is there a compelling reason the "Master Ball locations" table is sortable? There really doesn't seem to be any reason to sort it except in chronological order by generation/game, which we're already doing by default, making the sortability pretty much useless, since all the other columns are random factoids that a person would have no reason to want to see in alphabetical order. Plus, if we got rid of the sortability, we could vertically merge the generation and game cells, which I think would look much more aesthetically pleasing. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 15:00, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
:Technically, you're able to merge cells vertically while keeping a table sortable (the cells will just "unmerge" if you just click on any of the sortable arrows). However, I made the table unsortable anyways since it wasn't necessary. --[[User:Carmenstar97|<span style="color:#95EB5C">Carmen<small>★</small></span>]] <small>''[[User talk:Carmenstar97|<span style="color:#FEBEE8">(Talk |</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Carmenstar97|<span style="color:#A6DAFC">contribs)</span>]]''</small> 18:17, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
24,122

edits