42
edits
Uncleben85 (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 130: | Line 130: | ||
Alola confirms Tauros and Miltank as male and female counterparts in separate species, as with Nidoran. Should they be mentioned in the lede?[[User:KrytenKoro|KrytenKoro]] ([[User talk:KrytenKoro|talk]]) 18:15, 4 February 2017 (UTC) | Alola confirms Tauros and Miltank as male and female counterparts in separate species, as with Nidoran. Should they be mentioned in the lede?[[User:KrytenKoro|KrytenKoro]] ([[User talk:KrytenKoro|talk]]) 18:15, 4 February 2017 (UTC) | ||
:The Alola Dex just confirms them as grouped, the same way that it groups (for instance) the tapus. It doesn't specifically confirm that their grouping is defined by their genders. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 18:49, 4 February 2017 (UTC) | :The Alola Dex just confirms them as grouped, the same way that it groups (for instance) the tapus. It doesn't specifically confirm that their grouping is defined by their genders. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 18:49, 4 February 2017 (UTC) | ||
:I do not have issue mentioning their relationship in a separate subsection, or in the trivia. Before adding those two though, I think it would be more appropriate to mention the relationships between Pokemon such as Gardevoir/Gallade, Glalie/Froslass, and Wormadam/Mothim as they actually share common pre-evolutions and are direct gender counterparts. Similarly, Nidoran♀ and Nidoran♂ are distinct Pokemon, not just gender differences, and I feel like should be mentioned separately (this would also allow differences to be discussed between the fully family lines if wanted). -[[User:Uncleben85|Uncleben85]] ([[User talk:Uncleben85|talk]]) 04:19, 5 February 2017 (UTC) |
edits