1,953
edits
User talk:Tiddlywinks/Archive 3: Difference between revisions
User talk:Tiddlywinks/Archive 3 (view source)
Revision as of 18:31, 2 February 2017
, 2 February 2017→Aura trio/mascot trio?
Celadonkey (talk | contribs) |
Celadonkey (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1,654: | Line 1,654: | ||
:As far as the line about the Battle Tower, Zygarde is still not a game mascot. This is hardly some rule the games have explicitly stated, anyway. I'd suggest that that line shouldn't factor into your concerns for the time being. The main point would be to figure which table Zygarde (and/or Suicune) "belongs" in and how that can be reasonably justified. Once that's settled, the line about the Battle Tower can be modified if necessary. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 18:03, 2 February 2017 (UTC) | :As far as the line about the Battle Tower, Zygarde is still not a game mascot. This is hardly some rule the games have explicitly stated, anyway. I'd suggest that that line shouldn't factor into your concerns for the time being. The main point would be to figure which table Zygarde (and/or Suicune) "belongs" in and how that can be reasonably justified. Once that's settled, the line about the Battle Tower can be modified if necessary. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 18:03, 2 February 2017 (UTC) | ||
::In that case, I'd have to go with either we put the Beasts in Mascot Trios, or... This might sound crazy but I think we should either change Normal/Mascot trios to Normal/Special legend trios (or something like that, you get the idea, IMO makes a lot more sense) or get rid of the split altogether. --[[User:Celadonkey|<span style="color:#98CC00">Celad</span>]][[User_talk:Celadonkey|<span style="color:#FFC37D">onkey</span>]] 18:14, 2 February 2017 (UTC) | ::In that case, I'd have to go with either we put the Beasts in Mascot Trios, or... This might sound crazy but I think we should either change Normal/Mascot trios to Normal/Special legend trios (or something like that, you get the idea, IMO makes a lot more sense) or get rid of the split altogether. --[[User:Celadonkey|<span style="color:#98CC00">Celad</span>]][[User_talk:Celadonkey|<span style="color:#FFC37D">onkey</span>]] 18:14, 2 February 2017 (UTC) | ||
:::I know this is off topic, but I think that we still should have the Eternal Floette data on the Floette page. You mentioned that it hasn't been released yet, but Marshadow has its page because anyone can modify their save and put in a Marshadow... why not the same for Floette? --[[User:Celadonkey|<span style="color:#98CC00">Celad</span>]][[User_talk:Celadonkey|<span style="color:#FFC37D">onkey</span>]] 18:31, 2 February 2017 (UTC) | |||