73
edits
Talk:Poké Pelago: Difference between revisions
→Assuming equal priority
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
:::The point makes no reference to Refresh. The point only talks about Poke Pelago. It doesn't need to talk about Refresh. People can decide on their own if they want to use Beans there instead. There is no objective comparison to make between them otherwise. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 01:55, 6 January 2017 (UTC) | :::The point makes no reference to Refresh. The point only talks about Poke Pelago. It doesn't need to talk about Refresh. People can decide on their own if they want to use Beans there instead. There is no objective comparison to make between them otherwise. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 01:55, 6 January 2017 (UTC) | ||
::::I was just about to say the same thing (but got an edit conflict instead :)) --[[User:Wowy|<span style="color:green">'''Wowy'''</span>]][[User talk:Wowy|<sub style="color:#ED9121;">'''(토크)'''</sub>]] 02:01, 6 January 2017 (UTC) | ::::I was just about to say the same thing (but got an edit conflict instead :)) --[[User:Wowy|<span style="color:green">'''Wowy'''</span>]][[User talk:Wowy|<sub style="color:#ED9121;">'''(토크)'''</sub>]] 02:01, 6 January 2017 (UTC) | ||
:::::Meh. I guess if it doesn't explicitly claim that it's more efficient to use them for one or the other of developing islands or Refresh (which is how I read it at first) the there's no serious problem. I might have been biased in favour of mentioning that we are assuming Refresh is not a higher priority because the article as I first read it ''did'' make this assumption without explicitly stating so. [[User:Satorukun0530|Satorukun0530]] ([[User talk:Satorukun0530|talk]]) 03:15, 6 January 2017 (UTC) | |||