330
edits
User talk:Kogoro/8: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 409: | Line 409: | ||
Would it be a good idea if TCRF.net were added to [[Special:Interwiki]]? [[smw:Special:Interwiki|MarioWiki does it]]. It might be better for some pages that link [https://www.tcrf.net/Pok%C3%A9mon_Colosseum#Japanese_Bonus_Disc like this]. I forget where I learned about the hidden mode for Celebi in [[Pokémon Colosseum]] but I first learned about it here but this place pointed to TCRF. --[[User:Wildgoosespeeder|Wildgoosespeeder]] ([[User talk:Wildgoosespeeder|talk]]) 23:30, 29 December 2016 (UTC) | Would it be a good idea if TCRF.net were added to [[Special:Interwiki]]? [[smw:Special:Interwiki|MarioWiki does it]]. It might be better for some pages that link [https://www.tcrf.net/Pok%C3%A9mon_Colosseum#Japanese_Bonus_Disc like this]. I forget where I learned about the hidden mode for Celebi in [[Pokémon Colosseum]] but I first learned about it here but this place pointed to TCRF. --[[User:Wildgoosespeeder|Wildgoosespeeder]] ([[User talk:Wildgoosespeeder|talk]]) 23:30, 29 December 2016 (UTC) | ||
== Copyright misunderstanding == | |||
So, sorry to bother you, but I got myself in the most unpleasant situation. | |||
Recently I added some Origin to the Garchomp page, Bulette, a D&D original creature. | |||
The user [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpking0192]] started a edit war claiming that "you" (I guess he thinks he's a staff member?) don't accept modern/copyrighted basis on the Origin section. All Right. | |||
The "modern" sounded like a biased personal criteria to me since maaany Pokémon have modern inspirations, regardless, Dragon and Dungeons is almost half a century old and is really relevant to the RPG culture and could easily influence Pokémon, so I find hard to just ignore it. But the copyright could indeed be a problem; so, after some quick research I found the official list of their copyrighted creatures and Bulette wasn't one of them. So I added the Origin back and explained that it seemed like Bulette was not copyrighted. | |||
Still, he removed it one more time with the same argument. I reverted it one more time and asked him to create a topic on the Talk Page if he wanted to debate about it properly and further, or to leave the Origin's viability analysis to some staff member. Then, the Administrator glik intervened and removed the changes, he went to my talk page and told me to find proof of Bulette's situation and to contact an Editorial member about it. So here I am. I guess he didn't believe me about it or misunderstood me, dunno. | |||
I wasn't sure who I had to contact, but a friend of mine that works on the staff told me you would be the most adequate. | |||
Anyway, here's the list they wanted, third question: | |||
* "http://5e.d20srd.org/faq.htm" | |||
tl; dr. Pompous random user removing things around, staff tells me to prove landshark ain't copyrighted to someone above him, here I am, end. | |||
What happens now? Can I re-add it since it's all good? I mean, it was all good from the very beginning, but whatever. Thanks~ | |||
[[User:ExLight|ExLight]] ([[User talk:ExLight|talk]]) 21:42, 5 January 2017 (UTC) | |||