569
edits
Talk:Pokémon-Amie: Difference between revisions
→Affection split
(→Poke Puffs: new section) |
Iam.soviet19 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 242: | Line 242: | ||
:It's a bit weird, though, that you've put the template on the Stats section, where affection is definitely not the only thing it talks about. Since, from your comment above, it seems affection is really the only thing you're concerned about, then I suppose the split would mostly remove the Affection benefits and Battle quotes sections from this page? And if that'd be the bulk of the new page, IMO it might not be the ''most'' robust page. I don't really see how anything else from that section could rightly be removed in a split (though maybe the new page would note a few things besides those sections, without ''removing'' the same info from here)—unless the new page will not be "Affection" after all but something encompassing all the stats. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 12:43, 3 November 2015 (UTC) | :It's a bit weird, though, that you've put the template on the Stats section, where affection is definitely not the only thing it talks about. Since, from your comment above, it seems affection is really the only thing you're concerned about, then I suppose the split would mostly remove the Affection benefits and Battle quotes sections from this page? And if that'd be the bulk of the new page, IMO it might not be the ''most'' robust page. I don't really see how anything else from that section could rightly be removed in a split (though maybe the new page would note a few things besides those sections, without ''removing'' the same info from here)—unless the new page will not be "Affection" after all but something encompassing all the stats. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 12:43, 3 November 2015 (UTC) | ||
::I didn't mean to suggest that the entire section should be split, just that all (or the vast majority) of content that would be on the proposed separate affection page would come from that section. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 01:02, 4 November 2015 (UTC) | ::I didn't mean to suggest that the entire section should be split, just that all (or the vast majority) of content that would be on the proposed separate affection page would come from that section. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 01:02, 4 November 2015 (UTC) | ||
:::Now that Sun and Moon have been released, it certainly looks like Affection is no longer exclusive to Amie. Anyways, it would be neat if the evolution for Eevee into Sylveon would just state the need for ''affection'' rather than repeatedly mentioning ''Pokémon Amie and Pokémon Refresh'' at each instant it appears. Also, it looks like the benefits and quotes can be mostly merged into a new article, while the mechanics unique to Amie or Refresh could stay, or something. [[User:iam.soviet19|<span style="color:#11AA11">iAM</span>]]''' [[User talk:iam.soviet19|<span style="color:#AA1111"><sc> soViet</sc></span>]][[Special:Contributions/iam.soviet19|<span style="color:#1111AA">19</span>]]''' 23:38, 2 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
== Poke Puffs == | == Poke Puffs == | ||
While most Pokemon need 2 or 3 bites, there are some who need 5 (like {{p|Budew}}), and supposedly there are some who eat Puffs in one bite, although I don't know which one do. This is not listed in the stats table. [[User:Eridanus|Eridanus]] ([[User talk:Eridanus|talk]]) 10:42, 18 August 2016 (UTC) | While most Pokemon need 2 or 3 bites, there are some who need 5 (like {{p|Budew}}), and supposedly there are some who eat Puffs in one bite, although I don't know which one do. This is not listed in the stats table. [[User:Eridanus|Eridanus]] ([[User talk:Eridanus|talk]]) 10:42, 18 August 2016 (UTC) | ||