User:Nescientist/Damage: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 109: Line 109:
|{{m|Light Screen}}
|{{m|Light Screen}}
|0.5 {{tt|*|~0.66 if there is more than one Pokémon on either side of the field}}
|0.5 {{tt|*|~0.66 if there is more than one Pokémon on either side of the field}}
|If set on the defender's side, the move used is special, not a [[critical hit]], and the user's Ability is not {{a|Infiltrator}}
|Form Generation III onward, if set on the defender's side, the move used is special, not a [[critical hit]], and the user's Ability is not {{a|Infiltrator}}
|-
|-
|rowspan=2 |{{m|Magnitude}}
|rowspan=2 |{{m|Magnitude}}
Line 140: Line 140:
|{{m|Reflect}}
|{{m|Reflect}}
|0.5 {{tt|*|~0.66 if there is more than one Pokémon on either side of the field}}
|0.5 {{tt|*|~0.66 if there is more than one Pokémon on either side of the field}}
|If set on the defender's side, the move used is physical, not a [[critical hit]], and the user's Ability is not {{a|Infiltrator}}
|From Generation III onward, if set on the defender's side, the move used is physical, not a [[critical hit]], and the user's Ability is not {{a|Infiltrator}}
|-
|-
|{{m|Shadow Force}}
|{{m|Shadow Force}}
Line 237: Line 237:
1 beautify hidden details
1 beautify hidden details
2 link to "modified/effective whatever" properly (when you know how to offload info to power and statistic articles)
2 link to "modified/effective whatever" properly (when you know how to offload info to power and statistic articles)
3 guess not: say it's accurate for Gen V (onward?) only!? (TODO: check Selfdestruct/Explosion, Reflect/LS early Gens)
3 guess not: say it's accurate for Gen V (onward?) only!? (should now be accurate for all gens, except order)
  3' guess not: say the exact "Modifier" order is accurate for Gen V (onward) only
  3' guess not: say the exact "Modifier" order is accurate for Gen V (onward) only
4 guess not: say something on stacking/chaining modifiers!? That's way to hard to ''explain'', but possibly could be done by just giving formula; the new modifier will be the added/appended one if the old one was "1", or something largely unpredictable if it was something else
4 guess not: say something on stacking/chaining modifiers!? That's way to hard to ''explain'', but possibly could be done by just giving formula; the new modifier will be the added/appended one if the old one was "1", or something largely unpredictable if it was something else