34
edits
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
::::You've worded it better than I could PumpkinKing, thanks for that, as well as removing it. [[User:Unowninator|Unowninator]] ([[User talk:Unowninator|talk]]) 05:32, 25 June 2016 (UTC) | ::::You've worded it better than I could PumpkinKing, thanks for that, as well as removing it. [[User:Unowninator|Unowninator]] ([[User talk:Unowninator|talk]]) 05:32, 25 June 2016 (UTC) | ||
::One thing I have to note: Even though the Mythical and Legendary Pokemon are now split, Poison is still the only type to have neither. Isn't that notable enough? --[[User:Epictwilight901|DarkShinyLugia]] ([[User talk:Epictwilight901|talk]]) 22:30, 29 September 2016 (UTC) | ::One thing I have to note: Even though the Mythical and Legendary Pokemon are now split, Poison is still the only type to have neither. Isn't that notable ''enough''? I mean, there are 18 types, and only one lacks both. No matter how many types are only missing one of the two, I highly doubt that any new type will ever be without one or the other. (And frankly, I feel that Poison will never get a legitimate Legendary/Mythical Pokemon, but at least it would end this debate permanently.) --[[User:Epictwilight901|DarkShinyLugia]] ([[User talk:Epictwilight901|talk]]) 22:30, 29 September 2016 (UTC) |
edits