editlock-exempt
1,925
edits
User talk:VioletPumpkin: Difference between revisions
→Your research on moves
Nescientist (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
:Thanks for some of these sources! I'll probably take a closer look at them later - probably once I get through at least some of the massive pile of Super Mystery Dungeon things that need doing, unless I notice something through recent edits. That said, for what it's worth, I do tend to find the research done/posted on Smogon in recent years, which is then passed on to Showdown, to be reliable (I chipped in a bit right after the release of XY and found the things posted by at the very least the more prolific researchers to be reliable). [[User:VioletPumpkin|VioletPumpkin]] ([[User talk:VioletPumpkin|talk]]) 19:16, 28 August 2016 (UTC) | :Thanks for some of these sources! I'll probably take a closer look at them later - probably once I get through at least some of the massive pile of Super Mystery Dungeon things that need doing, unless I notice something through recent edits. That said, for what it's worth, I do tend to find the research done/posted on Smogon in recent years, which is then passed on to Showdown, to be reliable (I chipped in a bit right after the release of XY and found the things posted by at the very least the more prolific researchers to be reliable). [[User:VioletPumpkin|VioletPumpkin]] ([[User talk:VioletPumpkin|talk]]) 19:16, 28 August 2016 (UTC) | ||
::It's always good to do what you're into at the moment anyway; I didn't write here to draw your attention away from other things. I primarily wanted to thank you for testing things I had already noticed we (presumably) had wrong, and also inform you on things you may be interested in but not aware of. And, possibly, also keep you from testing things we ''may'' have reliable sources for. If you have time, though, of course I wouldn't exactly oppose additional input (or just explicit affirmation) for ideas like the Effect section proposal. [[User:Nescientist|Nescientist]] ([[User talk:Nescientist|talk]]) 19:52, 28 August 2016 (UTC) | ::It's always good to do what you're into at the moment anyway; I didn't write here to draw your attention away from other things. I primarily wanted to thank you for testing things I had already noticed we (presumably) had wrong, and also inform you on things you may be interested in but not aware of. And, possibly, also keep you from testing things we ''may'' have reliable sources for. If you have time, though, of course I wouldn't exactly oppose additional input (or just explicit affirmation) for ideas like the Effect section proposal. [[User:Nescientist|Nescientist]] ([[User talk:Nescientist|talk]]) 19:52, 28 August 2016 (UTC) | ||
:::I understand, thanks again for bringing those things up, since I wasn't aware of them. :) I agree with everything I see in the Effect section proposal and don't really have anything else to add at this time, though I only really skimmed through it, so I could've easily missed something. [[User:VioletPumpkin|VioletPumpkin]] ([[User talk:VioletPumpkin|talk]]) 20:06, 28 August 2016 (UTC) | |||