Talk:Pokémon Red and Blue Versions: Difference between revisions

Line 124: Line 124:


It has been suggested that the title of this article be renamed "Pokémon Red and Blue." I'm okay with the suggestion, but even though other territories don't use the word "version," North America does, so we should refer to them by their full North American names. Thank you. [[User:Crunchdog29|Crunchdog29]] ([[User talk:Crunchdog29|talk]]) 23:26, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
It has been suggested that the title of this article be renamed "Pokémon Red and Blue." I'm okay with the suggestion, but even though other territories don't use the word "version," North America does, so we should refer to them by their full North American names. Thank you. [[User:Crunchdog29|Crunchdog29]] ([[User talk:Crunchdog29|talk]]) 23:26, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
== Development section ==
Could someone explain to me why the section starts off with "''This section is about general development info. For development leftovers and unused content, see [[Pokémon Red and Green beta]].''", and then continues to just list things the linked article does explain anyway? Wouldn't it make more sense to have this section basically be similar to the one on [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pok%C3%A9mon_Red_and_Blue the Wikipedia page] in that it explains how the games were developed (maybe with more focus on Red and Blue then them), and then maybe ''also'' introduce the main article on leftovers and unused content (e.g. with a {{template|main}} template)? With the current structure, I'm having problems to find a good way to include general development info present on Wikipedia. [[User:Nescientist|Nescientist]] ([[User talk:Nescientist|talk]]) 18:15, 3 July 2016 (UTC)