70
edits
Talk:Deck archetype (TCG): Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Pikachu6780 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
Night March is a huge deck in the format, and has been huge since it was printed. I believe it deserves its own article, similar to [[Porydonk (TCG)]] [[User:Pikachu6780|I'm still new to this forum thing -Pikachu6780]] ([[User talk:Pikachu6780|talk]]) 00:09, 13 April 2016 (UTC) | Night March is a huge deck in the format, and has been huge since it was printed. I believe it deserves its own article, similar to [[Porydonk (TCG)]] [[User:Pikachu6780|I'm still new to this forum thing -Pikachu6780]] ([[User talk:Pikachu6780|talk]]) 00:09, 13 April 2016 (UTC) | ||
== Deck Names == | |||
I know I love giving my decks creative names and some of these decks are so well known that only a novice wouldn't know what it was called... but then again a novice is probably the one that needs to look up such a deck. When we get to the less well known decks or archetypes from the past, it can be quite frustrating to have to click through multiple articles because the deck has a name that doesn't mention any of the key cards or effects by name. | |||
So perhaps there is a better way to name the articles? Some decks are very fluid so it might take some tinkering to make it work but having two columns, like "Primary Name" and "Primary Focus" with the former being the general deck name and the latter being the main card of the deck would help out a lot. I mean, I'm no genius and there are a lot of decks I either never saw or can't remember, but I'm a long term player and if I am getting confused, I pity the newbies. | |||
[[User:Otakutron|Otakutron]] ([[User talk:Otakutron|talk]]) 16:54, 2 July 2016 (UTC) | |||