150
edits
(→English name: new section) |
|||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
== Type-effectiveness Template == | == Type-effectiveness Template == | ||
Asking here since I don't know any better place to do so. For the newly-revealed Pokémon, are we purposefully omitting the type-effectiveness chart in case there are any changes to specific weaknesses and resistances, or has it just not been added to the appropriate pages yet? For a Pokémon like this which has both its type and ability revealed it'd seem like something simple enough to add... --[[User:AndyPKMN|Andy<sup>P</sup><sub>K</sub><sup>M</sup><sub>N</sub>]] [[User talk:AndyPKMN|(talk)]] 16:30, 1 July 2016 (UTC) | Asking here since I don't know any better place to do so. For the newly-revealed Pokémon, are we purposefully omitting the type-effectiveness chart in case there are any changes to specific weaknesses and resistances, or has it just not been added to the appropriate pages yet? For a Pokémon like this which has both its type and ability revealed it'd seem like something simple enough to add... --[[User:AndyPKMN|Andy<sup>P</sup><sub>K</sub><sup>M</sup><sub>N</sub>]] [[User talk:AndyPKMN|(talk)]] 16:30, 1 July 2016 (UTC) | ||
== English name == | |||
Where does "Vika" come from?[[User:Chrisbulb|Christian]] ([[User talk:Chrisbulb|talk]]) 18:29, 1 July 2016 (UTC) |
edits