150
edits
(→English name: new section) |
|||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Asking here since I don't know any better place to do so. For the newly-revealed Pokémon, are we purposefully omitting the type-effectiveness chart in case there are any changes to specific weaknesses and resistances, or has it just not been added to the appropriate pages yet? For a Pokémon like this which has both its type and ability revealed it'd seem like something simple enough to add... --[[User:AndyPKMN|Andy<sup>P</sup><sub>K</sub><sup>M</sup><sub>N</sub>]] [[User talk:AndyPKMN|(talk)]] 16:30, 1 July 2016 (UTC) | Asking here since I don't know any better place to do so. For the newly-revealed Pokémon, are we purposefully omitting the type-effectiveness chart in case there are any changes to specific weaknesses and resistances, or has it just not been added to the appropriate pages yet? For a Pokémon like this which has both its type and ability revealed it'd seem like something simple enough to add... --[[User:AndyPKMN|Andy<sup>P</sup><sub>K</sub><sup>M</sup><sub>N</sub>]] [[User talk:AndyPKMN|(talk)]] 16:30, 1 July 2016 (UTC) | ||
Where does "Vika" come from?[[User:Chrisbulb|Christian]] ([[User talk:Chrisbulb|talk]]) 18:27, 1 July 2016 (UTC) | |||
[[User:Chrisbulb|Christian]] ([[User talk:Chrisbulb|talk]]) 18: | |||
edits