53,511
edits
User talk:Kogoro/7: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 373: | Line 373: | ||
::Thank you very much for the reply! It is unfortunate that such linking cannot be properly performed.. In any case, I viewed the example that you provided for the [[Master Ball]]; it currently seems like a usable workaround (although admittedly, I initially missed seeing that text since I tend to focus more on the left-side text than the right-side text, probably because Item names are boldfaced on the left side.. XD). I am glad to hear that additional options (in terms of "Item" articles) are undergoing staff consideration/deliberation. | ::Thank you very much for the reply! It is unfortunate that such linking cannot be properly performed.. In any case, I viewed the example that you provided for the [[Master Ball]]; it currently seems like a usable workaround (although admittedly, I initially missed seeing that text since I tend to focus more on the left-side text than the right-side text, probably because Item names are boldfaced on the left side.. XD). I am glad to hear that additional options (in terms of "Item" articles) are undergoing staff consideration/deliberation. | ||
::The main reason I was inquiring was because of the current existence of articles for several [[Generation 3]] [[Event item|event]] [[key item]]s, such as the [[Eon Ticket]] and the [[Old Sea Map]]. I will wait for further deliberation regarding standard Items, then. However, in regards to the Key Items that already have their own articles (mostly visible '''[[:Category:Key | ::The main reason I was inquiring was because of the current existence of articles for several [[Generation 3]] [[Event item|event]] [[key item]]s, such as the [[Eon Ticket]] and the [[Old Sea Map]]. I will wait for further deliberation regarding standard Items, then. However, in regards to the Key Items that already have their own articles (mostly visible '''[[:Category:Key Items|here]]'''), is it permissible to link to the already-existing articles while refraining from ''creating'' articles on standard Items (like the Destiny Knot, etc.)? Or should I refrain from linking to the already-existing "Key Item" articles as well until further deliberation has occurred? Thanks for your help. [[User:Fenyx4|Fenyx4]] ([[User talk:Fenyx4|talk]]) 04:30, 26 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
:::Yes, it's fine to add appropriate links to existing articles. - [[User:Kogoro|'''<span class="sc" style="color:#DA70D6;">Kogoro</span>''']] '''-''' [[User talk:Kogoro|'''<span class="sc" style="color:#FFB6C1;">Talk to me</span>''']] - 04:53, 27 January 2016 (UTC) | :::Yes, it's fine to add appropriate links to existing articles. - [[User:Kogoro|'''<span class="sc" style="color:#DA70D6;">Kogoro</span>''']] '''-''' [[User talk:Kogoro|'''<span class="sc" style="color:#FFB6C1;">Talk to me</span>''']] - 04:53, 27 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
::::Okay; thanks again for the clarification. [[User:Fenyx4|Fenyx4]] ([[User talk:Fenyx4|talk]]) 17:42, 28 January 2016 (UTC) | ::::Okay; thanks again for the clarification. [[User:Fenyx4|Fenyx4]] ([[User talk:Fenyx4|talk]]) 17:42, 28 January 2016 (UTC) | ||