User talk:Pumpkinking0192/Archive 4: Difference between revisions

Bringing this up here before I do any further edits. The Zygarde section seems to put a lot of emphasis on trying to justify the Loki's children theory, and Norse mythology in general. With leaving little room for other interpretation. If you want to trim down the section I suggest removing a lot of the justification for these theories too. Like how is a long lines fine like this one: ''Zygarde Complete Forme may be based on Hel, the ruler of {{wp|Hel (location)|Helheim}}, the realm of the dead in Nordic myth. She is often depicted as a half alive and half dead being, which may have inspired Zygarde's theme of balance between life and death.''  But a short note that Complete may be based on a combined Mecha not? Complete has a very strong physical appearance and generally looks inorganic, this in contrast to Hel who is frail. The Mecha not can help give insight into that.  

Flatworms being able to form into bigger multi-cellular creatures is incorrect, they can just split into several individuals if cut in two, but not actually merge. Flatworms should either be left out of that sentence completely or get their own specifying that case. I support the first. Also I think Euglana is worth mentioning because they are the creatures that visually look the most like Zygarde Core, on top of the photosynthesis link. [[User:Petrichor|Petrichor]] ([[User talk:Petrichor|talk]]) 05:38, 10 June 2016 (UTC)