472
edits
User talk:ChE clarinetist: Difference between revisions
→Ash's Leavanny gender trivia
| Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
:Pikachu is special because he was introduced in Gen I, and was specifically referred to as male, before genders were applied to Pokémon. Sceptile was only referred to by the main characters, but was never confirmed. There are 14 other Pokémon Ash owns that have confirmed genders that do not have the trivia point for what episode the gender was confirmed in, that is why I removed the gender trivia from Leavanny's page. [[User:ChE clarinetist|ChE clarinetist]] ([[User talk:ChE clarinetist|talk]]) 17:09, 6 May 2016 (UTC) | :Pikachu is special because he was introduced in Gen I, and was specifically referred to as male, before genders were applied to Pokémon. Sceptile was only referred to by the main characters, but was never confirmed. There are 14 other Pokémon Ash owns that have confirmed genders that do not have the trivia point for what episode the gender was confirmed in, that is why I removed the gender trivia from Leavanny's page. [[User:ChE clarinetist|ChE clarinetist]] ([[User talk:ChE clarinetist|talk]]) 17:09, 6 May 2016 (UTC) | ||
::How does a Pokémon being referred to as a gender only in the English dub qualify as a trivia point but not when it is confirmed in both. Probably every Pokémon that was confirmed in the English dub has a trivia point Misty's Psyduck for example has a point that says the episode in which it was referred to as a male so why not Leavanny or the other Pokémon. Think of it this way if someone is reading the article and sees it says male and what if they then want to know how it was confirmed, if there is a trivia point that says this they will find out exactly how without it how are they supposed to find out. Will it make articles any worse? I doubt it.[[User:Ratchet and Clank 1995|Ratchet and Clank 1995]] ([[User talk:Ratchet and Clank 1995|talk]]) 17:35, 6 May 2016 (UTC) | ::How does a Pokémon being referred to as a gender only in the English dub qualify as a trivia point but not when it is confirmed in both. Probably every Pokémon that was confirmed in the English dub has a trivia point Misty's Psyduck for example has a point that says the episode in which it was referred to as a male so why not Leavanny or the other Pokémon. Think of it this way if someone is reading the article and sees it says male and what if they then want to know how it was confirmed, if there is a trivia point that says this they will find out exactly how without it how are they supposed to find out. Will it make articles any worse? I doubt it.[[User:Ratchet and Clank 1995|Ratchet and Clank 1995]] ([[User talk:Ratchet and Clank 1995|talk]]) 17:35, 6 May 2016 (UTC) | ||
:::Specifically, because it was directly confirmed in both it is not needed as a trivia point. I did just check, and for a lot of the confirmed genders for Ash's Pokémon the episode it was confirmed in was listed their History section with a brief bit about how it was confirmed. That would be the appropriate place for that information, not a trivia point. [[User:ChE clarinetist|ChE clarinetist]] ([[User talk:ChE clarinetist|talk]]) 17:50, 6 May 2016 (UTC) | |||