User talk:DarienLeonhart: Difference between revisions

Line 94: Line 94:
::::I won't say it's required (though I do think it's part of being responsible). But since I have looked it up, it is informative.
::::I won't say it's required (though I do think it's part of being responsible). But since I have looked it up, it is informative.
::::If you really want to make a point of it, all I can say is, try finding someone who's mentioned it more recently. It's not the end of the world if someone does mention DA in a similar manner again; just tell them then if you have to. Hell, let's face it, you weren't likely to prevent ''anyone'' ever mentioning DA again just with that response. And FWIW I can also tell you, after this, *I'm* at least liable to relay the message too now if I notice somesuch myself. =P [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 14:36, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
::::If you really want to make a point of it, all I can say is, try finding someone who's mentioned it more recently. It's not the end of the world if someone does mention DA in a similar manner again; just tell them then if you have to. Hell, let's face it, you weren't likely to prevent ''anyone'' ever mentioning DA again just with that response. And FWIW I can also tell you, after this, *I'm* at least liable to relay the message too now if I notice somesuch myself. =P [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 14:36, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
:::I don't work for Bulbapedia. I am not required to do anything in regards to researching when someone was last active on the site. Nor am I to look for someone who mentioned DA more recently either. I saw a post about it. I don't care how old it was. I simply added a comment about DA not being a legit source of information. <br>[[User:DarienLeonhart|DarienLeonhart]] ([[User talk:DarienLeonhart|talk]]) 14:40, 2 January 2016 (UTC)