User talk:Flain: Difference between revisions

Line 28: Line 28:
:Problem with this warning: I only undid the edit once. I changed a piece of trivia my edit was undone and I undid that. I'm pretty sure doing something once isn't continually. Also since all Pokémon hatch from eggs it doesn't need to be confirmed that Ash's Frogadier (I view the events of episodes that haven't aired here in America yet as taking place in the future) hatched from an egg because it basically confirmed long before the XY series. So no, it's not valid. It's like saying Ash's Pikachu was never a Pichu since Ash obtained him before his pre evolved form was introduced.
:Problem with this warning: I only undid the edit once. I changed a piece of trivia my edit was undone and I undid that. I'm pretty sure doing something once isn't continually. Also since all Pokémon hatch from eggs it doesn't need to be confirmed that Ash's Frogadier (I view the events of episodes that haven't aired here in America yet as taking place in the future) hatched from an egg because it basically confirmed long before the XY series. So no, it's not valid. It's like saying Ash's Pikachu was never a Pichu since Ash obtained him before his pre evolved form was introduced.
::You removed it, got reverted and removed it again. That's the continually part, the edit-warring was more of a precautionary warning. And the Pikachu example is exactly the case. The Pikachu's infobox doesn't say "Pikachu spent X amount as a Pichu" because he was '''never''' a Pichu since Pichu was introduced before Pikachu. Like I said, the Kanto quartet were introduced before eggs were a thing, so they're exempt from the whole "All Pokémon hatch from eggs" until it is proven that they've come from eggs (because no eggs in Gen I).--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#AB2813">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#C87365">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#26649C">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#729ABF">ire</span>]] 04:56, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
::You removed it, got reverted and removed it again. That's the continually part, the edit-warring was more of a precautionary warning. And the Pikachu example is exactly the case. The Pikachu's infobox doesn't say "Pikachu spent X amount as a Pichu" because he was '''never''' a Pichu since Pichu was introduced before Pikachu. Like I said, the Kanto quartet were introduced before eggs were a thing, so they're exempt from the whole "All Pokémon hatch from eggs" until it is proven that they've come from eggs (because no eggs in Gen I).--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#AB2813">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#C87365">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#26649C">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#729ABF">ire</span>]] 04:56, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
:::Dude your logic is terrible and you're starting to make me question your intelligence. Or at least your level of common sense.
238

edits