25,228
edits
Talk:Claydol (Pokémon): Difference between revisions
→Category name
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
It seems to me that if the category name and the species is the same, it is trivia, because most people who visit Bulbapedia don't look at the category, so they don't know. If this isn't trivia, most of the trivia on Bulbapedia isn't trivia. For example: on [[Heracross]] it's trivia is noted that it's is the only Pokémon with this type combination: [[Bug]]/[[Fighting]]. But this can be found out by any interested Pokémon fan, which is the same for my trivia point with Claydol. [[User:Danny199|Danny199]] ([[User talk:Danny199|talk]]) 00:39, 24 August 2015 (UTC) | It seems to me that if the category name and the species is the same, it is trivia, because most people who visit Bulbapedia don't look at the category, so they don't know. If this isn't trivia, most of the trivia on Bulbapedia isn't trivia. For example: on [[Heracross]] it's trivia is noted that it's is the only Pokémon with this type combination: [[Bug]]/[[Fighting]]. But this can be found out by any interested Pokémon fan, which is the same for my trivia point with Claydol. [[User:Danny199|Danny199]] ([[User talk:Danny199|talk]]) 00:39, 24 August 2015 (UTC) | ||
:You cannot determine that Heracross is the only Bug/Fighting type by only looking at Heracross's page. Looking at Claydol's page makes it immediately apparent that its category is very close to its name. Furthermore, Claydol isn't the only Pokémon like that: {{p|Zubat}} and its evolutions, {{p|Gastly}}, {{p|Hypno}}, {{p|Ninjask}}, and several others have names and categories very close to being the same. <small>[[User:Glik|glik]]</small><sup>[[User talk:Glik|glak]]</sup> 00:47, 24 August 2015 (UTC) | :You cannot determine that Heracross is the only Bug/Fighting type by only looking at Heracross's page. Looking at Claydol's page makes it immediately apparent that its category is very close to its name. Furthermore, Claydol isn't the only Pokémon like that: {{p|Zubat}} and its evolutions, {{p|Gastly}}, {{p|Hypno}}, {{p|Ninjask}}, and several others have names and categories very close to being the same. <small>[[User:Glik|glik]]</small><sup>[[User talk:Glik|glak]]</sup> 00:47, 24 August 2015 (UTC) | ||
: I can't disagree with what you said about Heracross, but like I said earlier, any interested Pokémon fan could find it out in not too much time, so trivia or not? [http://www.pokemon.com/nl/pokedex/] On the other hand, seeing that the category name and species name are the same, needs a good look. I honestly never saw it until today, more because it never really attracts attention. In my opinion, both are sort of the same kind of trivia. [[User:Danny199|Danny199]] ([[User talk:Danny199|talk]]) 00:51, 24 August 2015 (UTC) | :: I can't disagree with what you said about Heracross, but like I said earlier, any interested Pokémon fan could find it out in not too much time, so trivia or not? [http://www.pokemon.com/nl/pokedex/] On the other hand, seeing that the category name and species name are the same, needs a good look. I honestly never saw it until today, more because it never really attracts attention. In my opinion, both are sort of the same kind of trivia. [[User:Danny199|Danny199]] ([[User talk:Danny199|talk]]) 00:51, 24 August 2015 (UTC) | ||
:::I don't know why you have a link to the Dutch Pokémon site. They're not the same kind of trivia. If it's already apparent on the page, it isn't trivia at all, regardless of if you didn't see it. If someone skips over the anime section, it doesn't make its first appearance in the anime a piece of trivia. And the category is right beneath the name, right at the top of the page, in the big fancy infobox that's made to grab attention. <small>[[User:Glik|glik]]</small><sup>[[User talk:Glik|glak]]</sup> 01:14, 24 August 2015 (UTC) | |||