Talk:List of Pokémon by base stats (Generation VI): Difference between revisions

→‎Sort by Evolutionary Status?: Just putting my two cents in. Not asking to be too dragged into this argument/debate.
(→‎Sort by Evolutionary Status?: Just putting my two cents in. Not asking to be too dragged into this argument/debate.)
Line 190: Line 190:
::::::::::And who are you to say that that is the page's sole purpose? Why should the page not also strive for ease of access? The ability to sort by stats is technically not necessary either -- without it, all the stats would still be there and users could still go through and pick out the stats they want. But it's there because it makes life easier for some people.  
::::::::::And who are you to say that that is the page's sole purpose? Why should the page not also strive for ease of access? The ability to sort by stats is technically not necessary either -- without it, all the stats would still be there and users could still go through and pick out the stats they want. But it's there because it makes life easier for some people.  
::::::::::And you didn't outright state that you were, with all certainty, going to undo my work -- even if it was fairly obviously implied. And even if you believe the chances of your being wrong to be either small or non-existent, shouldn't you take the course of action that takes heed of the off (in your opinion) chance of you actually being wrong? Shouldn't you be open to try something out, rather than just stubbornly assuming that the page should not be changed? Just in case? Just to be fair? Because you don't seem to be acting in the interests of the community. You're acting in your own interests; you want the page to remain the way you like it. If you were acting in everyone's interests, you'd have a better reason for not being open to trying something new than "I believe myself and my reasons." [[User:UltraX7|UltraX7]] ([[User talk:UltraX7|talk]]) 00:33, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
::::::::::And you didn't outright state that you were, with all certainty, going to undo my work -- even if it was fairly obviously implied. And even if you believe the chances of your being wrong to be either small or non-existent, shouldn't you take the course of action that takes heed of the off (in your opinion) chance of you actually being wrong? Shouldn't you be open to try something out, rather than just stubbornly assuming that the page should not be changed? Just in case? Just to be fair? Because you don't seem to be acting in the interests of the community. You're acting in your own interests; you want the page to remain the way you like it. If you were acting in everyone's interests, you'd have a better reason for not being open to trying something new than "I believe myself and my reasons." [[User:UltraX7|UltraX7]] ([[User talk:UltraX7|talk]]) 00:33, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
*I think I'm getting a "TL:DR" feeling here.  But in all seriousness, for this page, I don't see a point in adding it.  I think it is pretty obvious in the title of the actual page that listing Pokémon by their stats is it's sole purpose.  Something like this might be better for its own page or something.  Either way, it would be unwise to edit this page in such a way, seeing that it would probably led to "edit wars".  At least until the right folks are convinced or something, I'm not really sure myself. ----[[User:NateVirus|<span style="color:blue">NateVirus</span>]]<small>''([[User talk:NateVirus|<span style="color:green">Talk</span>]]''|''[[Special:Contributions/NateVirus|<span style="color:red">Contributions</span>]]''</small>) 00:47, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
677

edits