234
edits
Talk:Catch rate: Difference between revisions
→Critical catch shakes in Gen VI
Tiddlywinks (talk | contribs) (→Critical catch shakes in Gen VI: Allow me to focus this discussion here... (Not sure of a better way to "quote" the user)) |
|||
| Line 425: | Line 425: | ||
::First off: I cannot help but doubt what you think you saw. I can only think you are mistaken that it was a critical capture. I would like to hear from someone else that it is possible for two shakes to occur in a critical capture. (Also, can you say whether you saw it in XY or in ORAS?) | ::First off: I cannot help but doubt what you think you saw. I can only think you are mistaken that it was a critical capture. I would like to hear from someone else that it is possible for two shakes to occur in a critical capture. (Also, can you say whether you saw it in XY or in ORAS?) | ||
::(FWIW: the 0.39% thing has reared its head again on a new comment from Pokémon [[User talk:Tiddlywinks#Critical Captures|on my talk page]]. I will attempt to address it there.) [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 15:38, 10 December 2014 (UTC) | ::(FWIW: the 0.39% thing has reared its head again on a new comment from Pokémon [[User talk:Tiddlywinks#Critical Captures|on my talk page]]. I will attempt to address it there.) [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 15:38, 10 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
The editor - me - has seen both situations while critical capture: breaking after one and after two shakes. It would also make sense, because there are totally four checks again. I saw that in X & Y. But I see, as I have no solid proof... <br> | |||
So and why should the formula of b in GenV contain 65536 (=2^16) instead of 65535 (=2^16-1) like it always does? 65536 also is inconsistent with the other generations.--- Pokémon [[User:Pokémon|<sub>Questions?</sub>]] -- 15:56, 10 December 2014 (UTC) | |||