User talk:Pokémon: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:


You edited the [[Catch rate]] page to say that in Gen VI four shake checks are performed normally or two on a critical capture. While the former claim just makes sense given a ball can break after two shakes again, the latter is not so obvious; the default assumption would be that critical captures perform one shake check like in Gen V. Do you have a source for this claim? [[User:Dragonfree|Dragonfree]] ([[User talk:Dragonfree|talk]]) 17:45, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
You edited the [[Catch rate]] page to say that in Gen VI four shake checks are performed normally or two on a critical capture. While the former claim just makes sense given a ball can break after two shakes again, the latter is not so obvious; the default assumption would be that critical captures perform one shake check like in Gen V. Do you have a source for this claim? [[User:Dragonfree|Dragonfree]] ([[User talk:Dragonfree|talk]]) 17:45, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
== A couple Bulbapedia policies ==
Per [[Bulbapedia:Talk page policy]], your talk page should have a link to your archived talk page(s).
I'd also like to reiterate this here since I'm not confident that you will notice my response to you on my talk page... "I would ask you to please be very careful in the future about linking a different user and their talk page like you did [[User talk:Tiddlywinks#Critical Captures|above]]. It looks exactly like a signature, and when your actual signature doesn't look like a usual signature, it is ''very'' easy to miss your real signature and assume the comment is from Dragonfree. Thank you." I would also point out that [[Bulbapedia:Signature policy]] recommends you include a link to your talk page in your signature. If you had that link, it might have been a little harder for me to mistake who the comment was from. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 15:34, 10 December 2014 (UTC)