1
edit
Talk:Fairy (type): Difference between revisions
→Trivia: Origin of Fairy typing?
(→dual type resistance vs super effective damage question: oh ok thank you.) |
(→Trivia: Origin of Fairy typing?) |
||
| Line 201: | Line 201: | ||
:Add a sentence to the current number part, saying how many had their types changed when the type was introduced. The trivia is redundant and therefore unnecessary. Each trivia point should be judged on its ''own'' merits. Inconsistency between pages isn't a strong enough reason to keep redundant trivia, and "we have X so why not Y?" reasoning is almost never a strong enough reason anywhere. <span class="sc">[[User:Werdnae|<span style="color:#2D4B98;">Werdnae</span>]]</span> <small>[[User talk:Werdnae|<span style="color:#009000;">(talk)</span>]]</small> 21:33, 26 October 2013 (UTC) | :Add a sentence to the current number part, saying how many had their types changed when the type was introduced. The trivia is redundant and therefore unnecessary. Each trivia point should be judged on its ''own'' merits. Inconsistency between pages isn't a strong enough reason to keep redundant trivia, and "we have X so why not Y?" reasoning is almost never a strong enough reason anywhere. <span class="sc">[[User:Werdnae|<span style="color:#2D4B98;">Werdnae</span>]]</span> <small>[[User talk:Werdnae|<span style="color:#009000;">(talk)</span>]]</small> 21:33, 26 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
::I still stand by the assertion that if we're calling this redundant because people should be expected to be able to identify which Pokemon in the list section are and are not from certain generations, the same should go for the other type pages and it should be removed from them, too. Even if each trivia point should be judged individually, similar logic should be able to be applied for similar things on different pages. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 21:40, 26 October 2013 (UTC) | ::I still stand by the assertion that if we're calling this redundant because people should be expected to be able to identify which Pokemon in the list section are and are not from certain generations, the same should go for the other type pages and it should be removed from them, too. Even if each trivia point should be judged individually, similar logic should be able to be applied for similar things on different pages. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 21:40, 26 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
It should be noted that the Fairy type could be based off the {{wp|Fairy}} especially in regards to the weakness fairies possessed to what they referred to as "cold iron", which was any sort of steel. Still trying to work out the weakness to Poison. [[User:Ikarigullwing|Ikarigullwing]] ([[User talk:Ikarigullwing|talk]]) 00:06, 14 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Counting Mega-Evolutions as different Pokémon == | == Counting Mega-Evolutions as different Pokémon == | ||