17
edits
Talk:Dark (type): Difference between revisions
→The Implication of Dark
(→Japanese name translation: new section) |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:::::No Pokémon are actually malevolent. | :::::No Pokémon are actually malevolent. | ||
:::::I'm not confident about the actual Pokémon but the moveset is definately focussed on a pragmatic approach to fighting: Pulling any trick to win as opposed to the honour of fighting types (who the attacks are weak against.) --[[User:Fabu-Vinny|FabuVinny]] <sup>|[[User talk:Fabu-Vinny|Talk Page]]|</sup> 16:00, 11 April 2010 (UTC) | :::::I'm not confident about the actual Pokémon but the moveset is definately focussed on a pragmatic approach to fighting: Pulling any trick to win as opposed to the honour of fighting types (who the attacks are weak against.) --[[User:Fabu-Vinny|FabuVinny]] <sup>|[[User talk:Fabu-Vinny|Talk Page]]|</sup> 16:00, 11 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
Well, take Zoraork for example. He/she can learn the move Night Daze, and it is a dark type move, and the move's name starts with night, so dark ''can'' have something to do with night. And plus, when it's dark, it's night. -[[User:Dark Zoroark01.1|Dark Zoroark01.1]] ([[User talk:Dark Zoroark01.1|talk]]) 03:14, 1 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
==Special?== | ==Special?== | ||