9
edits
Talk:Beauty (Trainer class): Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* The change is notable enough for her to talk about it? One would think she wouldn't care to mention it if she'd just gone from a sporty jock girl to a fashionable one in a few months. | * The change is notable enough for her to talk about it? One would think she wouldn't care to mention it if she'd just gone from a sporty jock girl to a fashionable one in a few months. | ||
Like, aside from assuming that GF/Nintendo are so transphobic that they would veto any trans representation, no matter how subtle, I don't see why there should be any doubt. And that's a pretty unfair assumption to make of the Japanese devs. [[User:Nazerine|Nazerine]] ([[User talk:Nazerine|talk]]) 21:42, 3 January 2014 (UTC) | Like, aside from assuming that GF/Nintendo are so transphobic that they would veto any trans representation, no matter how subtle, I don't see why there should be any doubt. And that's a pretty unfair assumption to make of the Japanese devs. [[User:Nazerine|Nazerine]] ([[User talk:Nazerine|talk]]) 21:42, 3 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
About the male nursery aide: he states in Japanese that he is male, but crossdresses for his job. This does not make him definitively transgender, but one could make an argument that he might be trans. This is why I said the beauty in question is "definitively transgender". [[User:Nazerine|Nazerine]] ([[User talk:Nazerine|talk]]) 21:48, 3 January 2014 (UTC) | |||