Bulbapedia talk:Editor's Hub/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

:If you had been paying attention, no one is immediately saying they're faked or photoshopped. But what we ''are'' saying is they may very well be dummied out content. And again, as far as a wiki is concerned, if information is not 100% confirmed, it might as well be 100% fake. Bulbapedia has a reputation to keep, and if things that end up being utter bull get articles only for us to find out the truth later, how will that make the site look? And even if they are really there, they ''can'' indeed be patched out. That's what patches do. If someone who got, say, one of these "Volcanions" ends up losing data and having their save corrupted because it was patched out, well then that's their own fault. [[User:Schiffy|<font color="000999">Schiffy</font>]] ([[User_talk:Schiffy|<font color="FF6600">Speak to me</font>]]&#124;[[Special:Contributions/Schiffy|<font color="FF0000">What I've done</font>]]) 19:03, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

::Yes, I'm paying attention.  Here's the thing: if they are dummied out, that makes them notable just for that and they deserve to be recognized as deleted Pokémon.  Except perhaps for MissingNo, this would be the first case of this, no?  That's notable, and what would be their page as real Pokémon can then be redirected to an article on the deleted trio.  [[User:CycloneGU|CycloneGU]] ([[User talk:CycloneGU|talk]]) 20:04, 2 November 2013 (UTC)