User talk:SnorlaxMonster/Archive/7: Difference between revisions

→‎Bulbanews article about split-second Pokémon information: I understand, yet the reference could still be noted
(→‎Bulbanews article about split-second Pokémon information: I understand, yet the reference could still be noted)
Line 696: Line 696:
:The time at which it appears is mentioned in the second paragraph. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 15:08, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
:The time at which it appears is mentioned in the second paragraph. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 15:08, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
::SnorlaxMonster, I think he is trying to say that the mistake was intentional, as it is a reference to the split-second in which every pokémon enter a battle. To the user, if that's the case: The problem is that if that was their intention, they would at least refer the pokémon. I viewed the Direct (didn't even notice the split-second), and I can assure you they didn't do so. And even if they wanted to reveal it without other references, why would they just show it for a split-second? It wouldn't actually be a very adequate strategy. ''Even'' if they referred it. [[User:TheOriginalOne|<span style="color:red">'''オリ'''</span>]][[User talk:TheOriginalOne|<span style="color:green">'''ジ'''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/TheOriginalOne|<span style="color:blue">'''ナル'''</span>]] <small>TheOriginalOne</small> 15:19, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
::SnorlaxMonster, I think he is trying to say that the mistake was intentional, as it is a reference to the split-second in which every pokémon enter a battle. To the user, if that's the case: The problem is that if that was their intention, they would at least refer the pokémon. I viewed the Direct (didn't even notice the split-second), and I can assure you they didn't do so. And even if they wanted to reveal it without other references, why would they just show it for a split-second? It wouldn't actually be a very adequate strategy. ''Even'' if they referred it. [[User:TheOriginalOne|<span style="color:red">'''オリ'''</span>]][[User talk:TheOriginalOne|<span style="color:green">'''ジ'''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/TheOriginalOne|<span style="color:blue">'''ナル'''</span>]] <small>TheOriginalOne</small> 15:19, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
:::I understand. However, this reference ('During a battle, I think there will be a moment') could still be noted in the article. Then people could decide for themselves wheter they think it was intentional or not. [[User:Nickvang|Nickvang]] ([[User talk:Nickvang|talk]]) 15:23, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
413

edits