13,668
edits
Talk:Novelty Pokémon: Difference between revisions
→Deletion discussion: new section
JustPassing (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
(→Deletion discussion: new section) |
||
| Line 198: | Line 198: | ||
They both have a unique, gimmicky ability (Illusion) and were event-exclusive non-legendaries in Black and White, before being able to obtain N's Zorua in Black 2/White 2 (if I don't make any mistake). --[[User:JustPassing|JustPassing]] ([[User talk:JustPassing|talk]]) 22:58, 31 March 2013 (UTC) | They both have a unique, gimmicky ability (Illusion) and were event-exclusive non-legendaries in Black and White, before being able to obtain N's Zorua in Black 2/White 2 (if I don't make any mistake). --[[User:JustPassing|JustPassing]] ([[User talk:JustPassing|talk]]) 22:58, 31 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
== Deletion discussion == | |||
I don't think this article is notable. All of the criteria it lists are fairly arbitrary and don't satisfactorily separate Pokemon that are clearly gimmicky (Unown, Wobbuffet, Kecleon, etc) from those that I doubt most people would say are gimmicky, but meet the criteria anyway (Abra, Mr. Mime, Arceus, etc). There's an inherent gray area between gimmicky and non-gimmicky that I don't think anybody can draw a line through that will be acceptable to a large majority of people, so it's better not to include such a strongly non-neutral stance at all on a fact-based encyclopedia such as this. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 22:04, 18 July 2013 (UTC) | |||