129
edits
Talk:Fairy (type): Difference between revisions
→Idea to avoid confusion on individual type pages
Vienna Waltz (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
Yeah, it had bothered me a little bit before that Magnemite, Magneton, and Rotom, showed both the old types and new types in the same chart, but now with Fairy type (and I'm guessing at least 30 Pokemon getting the type), I really think now is the time to start making decisition like having a category page and changing how we treat the "former typed Pokemon" in the tables. | Yeah, it had bothered me a little bit before that Magnemite, Magneton, and Rotom, showed both the old types and new types in the same chart, but now with Fairy type (and I'm guessing at least 30 Pokemon getting the type), I really think now is the time to start making decisition like having a category page and changing how we treat the "former typed Pokemon" in the tables. | ||
[[User:CoolDudeAl|CoolDudeAl]] ([[User talk:CoolDudeAl|talk]]) 14:38, 14 June 2013 (UTC) | [[User:CoolDudeAl|CoolDudeAl]] ([[User talk:CoolDudeAl|talk]]) 14:38, 14 June 2013 (UTC) | ||
I agree, having the old type and the current type just looks confusing [[User:Vienna Waltz|Vienna Waltz]] ([[User talk:Vienna Waltz|talk]]) 03:07, 12 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Ice type == | == Ice type == | ||