Talk:Surf (move): Difference between revisions

Line 104: Line 104:
:No because it's an HM. [[User:JDDJS|JDDJS]] ([[User talk:JDDJS|talk]]) 20:41, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
:No because it's an HM. [[User:JDDJS|JDDJS]] ([[User talk:JDDJS|talk]]) 20:41, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
::I'm pretty sure it's not that; it's because it doesn't have any secondary effect like all the others do. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 21:23, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
::I'm pretty sure it's not that; it's because it doesn't have any secondary effect like all the others do. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 21:23, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
== Quibbles with Diablo del Oeste ==
First and least importantly, I don't think it's necessary to mention the change in Surfing Pikachu's color, since it only exists because of the way Gen I had to change the entire palette of the game, while Gen II could handle more colors simultaneously.
Secondly, the Gen III sprites. Look at the RSE sprite and look at Wailmer. The flippers are completely different, there's no underbelly, and generally speaking, there are practically zero distinguishing characteristics to identify it as any particular Pokemon. I don't agree that the FRLG sprite is recognizable as Poliwrath, but I can see where there's more wiggle room than RSE. The backside is difficult to make out even when zoomed in, but to me it looks more like a two-pronged tail than legs. The top of the head is rounded, without bumps for its eyes. And if it were meant to be Poliwrath, you'd think its prominent arms would be featured. Nope, I really think both Gen III sprites are just generic sprites. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 08:01, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
13,669

edits