1,171
edits
User talk:Gengarzilla: Difference between revisions
→Snorlax/Bayleef in Old Family Blend: new section
(→BW083 Poisoning: new section) |
(→Snorlax/Bayleef in Old Family Blend: new section) |
||
| Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
Both episodes showed the actual Poison status condition. However, one was caused by a direct attack, the other by a status move. Maybe it should be reworded to reflect that. [[User:G50|<span style="color:blue">''G''</span>]][[User talk:G50|<span style="color:orange">''50''</span>]] 14:34, 20 June 2012 (UTC) | Both episodes showed the actual Poison status condition. However, one was caused by a direct attack, the other by a status move. Maybe it should be reworded to reflect that. [[User:G50|<span style="color:blue">''G''</span>]][[User talk:G50|<span style="color:orange">''50''</span>]] 14:34, 20 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
== Snorlax/Bayleef in Old Family Blend == | |||
I'm getting sick of having to correct it. If you watch the episode, you'll see that Ash returns Snorlax into the Poké Ball in his '''right''' hand, and then looks in surprise at the Poké Ball in his '''left''', saying he didn't request '''that one'''. Therefore it can't possibly have been Snorlax that was sent, only one of the two we haven't seen yet (Bayleef and Cyndaquil). Follow this up with the scene where Barry is attacked by an unknown Pokémon, which isn't revealed to the viewer until Ash finds her. Why put suspense if Bayleef wasn't the one to sneak over? Consider their personalities also - Bayleef misses Ash terribly, wheras Heracross is easily distracted and Snorlax very lazy. Doesn't Bayleef swapping with Heracross, as opposed to Snorlax making an effort for something, make sense? | |||
Please do not change it back, I have had so many editors mistakingly change it because they don't note that Ash is looking at an empty ball, not Snorlax's ball. '''[[User:Toon Ganondorf|<span style="color:#00693E">Toon Ganondorf</span> ]] [[User Talk:Toon Ganondorf|<span style="color:#D4AF37">(t</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Toon Ganondorf|<span style="color:#D4AF37">c)</span>]]''' 04:29, 7 July 2012 (UTC) | |||