1,252
edits
User talk:Truthseeker4449: Difference between revisions
→Edit warring
(→Edit warring: Thank you Masatoshi) |
|||
| Line 139: | Line 139: | ||
I already explained why my edit is correct. You ignoring it does not mean you're right. And where did I fail the Code of Conduct? Youre asking where Truthseeker failed the Code but yet you don't show how I did. That's hypocrisy right there. Threatening to block someone is still intimidation, whether you have the power or not. Throwing around accusations at a newbie and then blocking them for that unresearched reason is an abuse of power. So please stop trying to intimidate me--[[User:SandmanDP|SandmanDP]] 23:22, 8 January 2012 (UTC) | I already explained why my edit is correct. You ignoring it does not mean you're right. And where did I fail the Code of Conduct? Youre asking where Truthseeker failed the Code but yet you don't show how I did. That's hypocrisy right there. Threatening to block someone is still intimidation, whether you have the power or not. Throwing around accusations at a newbie and then blocking them for that unresearched reason is an abuse of power. So please stop trying to intimidate me--[[User:SandmanDP|SandmanDP]] 23:22, 8 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
:Thank you {{tt|for coming to my aid Masatoshi|and for giving me a chance to reply on my talk page}}. After a quich check to see what "rebuttal" means, I have returned with the edit summary of the {{u|Turtwig A|guy}} who last reverted you. "No offense, but they mean the same thing, and BW006-Present is much more clearer imo." Is this the rebuttal you are looking for? [[User:Truthseeker4449|Truth]][[User talk:Truthseeker4449|seeker]][[Special:Contributions/Truthseeker4449|4449]] 23:26, 8 January 2012 (UTC) | :Thank you {{tt|for coming to my aid Masatoshi|and for giving me a chance to reply on my talk page}}. After a quich check to see what "rebuttal" means, I have returned with the edit summary of the {{u|Turtwig A|guy}} who last reverted you. "No offense, but they mean the same thing, and BW006-Present is much more clearer imo." Is this the rebuttal you are looking for? [[User:Truthseeker4449|Truth]][[User talk:Truthseeker4449|seeker]][[Special:Contributions/Truthseeker4449|4449]] 23:26, 8 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
::I already refuted that in the discussion. That's not enough of a reason. There is no evidence that Jenness has completely taken over the role, which is what the episode numbers imply. That's why using the episode numbers is wrong, and "Unova-native" is more specific | |||
and correct--[[User:SandmanDP|SandmanDP]] 23:37, 8 January 2012 (UTC) | |||