1,268
edits
User talk:Werdnae/Archive 2: Difference between revisions
→94 gone?
m (→94 gone?) |
|||
| Line 515: | Line 515: | ||
::then why are there any articles on on cheat only glitch pokemon?(the non-bold ones)--[[User:Rsrdaman|Rsrdaman]] 03:09, 3 May 2011 (UTC) | ::then why are there any articles on on cheat only glitch pokemon?(the non-bold ones)--[[User:Rsrdaman|Rsrdaman]] 03:09, 3 May 2011 (UTC) | ||
:::Some of them were determined to be possible via the Mew Glitch without a cheating device. Some others may have slipped by without getting noticed. I'll have a look into it. <span class="sc">[[User:Werdnae|<span style="color:#2D4B98;">Werdnae</span>]]</span> <small>[[User talk:Werdnae|<span style="color:#009000;">(talk)</span>]]</small> 03:15, 3 May 2011 (UTC) | :::Some of them were determined to be possible via the Mew Glitch without a cheating device. Some others may have slipped by without getting noticed. I'll have a look into it. <span class="sc">[[User:Werdnae|<span style="color:#2D4B98;">Werdnae</span>]]</span> <small>[[User talk:Werdnae|<span style="color:#009000;">(talk)</span>]]</small> 03:15, 3 May 2011 (UTC) | ||
::::Ok then, for example [[PC4SH]] is a non capturable glitch Pokémon, yet its been around for ages and has definetly not "slipped by". I hope all my time wasnt wasted, also who said cheat only Pokémon arent notable? Theres a whole part of gen 1 glitch pokemon for obtainable and non obtainable ones. I mean it '''is''' project glitchdex, to better organize efforts to write and improve articles about glitches. Just hoping that I wont waste my time on it if it will just get deleted. :/ --[[User:Rsrdaman|Rsrdaman]] 03:31, 3 May 2011 (UTC) | |||