8
edits
m (→"Table": reply) |
(→The Point?: The point is to provide info on the clearly popular subject of novelty pkmn.) |
||
Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
I don't see the point of this article. It is not giving information, and has basically become a battleground. Does anyone have a reason for keeping it up? I mean a good reason?[[User:StarlightCoordinator|Starlight is Beauty...]] 17:54, 24 January 2010 (UTC) | I don't see the point of this article. It is not giving information, and has basically become a battleground. Does anyone have a reason for keeping it up? I mean a good reason?[[User:StarlightCoordinator|Starlight is Beauty...]] 17:54, 24 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
:While I agree with what you're saying, this is a wiki, and we want to provide all the information about Pokémon that's out there. Clearly, this is a big issue in the fanbase, if people are debating it so hotly. The actual article, as it's set up right this second with formerly considered Pokémon, seems fine to me. It's the talk page that's at all a "battleground," just like any other article where a shred of opinion applies. [[User:SunnieSun|<span style="color:#FFCC11;">Sunnie☀</span>]] 07:49, 12 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
== ??? == | == ??? == |
edits