95
edits
Talk:LuxChomp (TCG)/Featured article candidate: Difference between revisions
Talk:LuxChomp (TCG)/Featured article candidate (view source)
Revision as of 19:45, 1 January 2011
, 1 January 2011no edit summary
m (→Object (3)) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==[[LuxChomp (TCG)]]==__NOTOC__ | ==[[LuxChomp (TCG)]]==__NOTOC__ | ||
====Support ( | ====Support (4)==== | ||
<!--Please remember to update the count along with your vote.--> | <!--Please remember to update the count along with your vote.--> | ||
* Nominating as an FAC candidate. Perhaps nominating your own article is frowned upon, but LuxChomp is a huge deal in the TCG right now, and has been arguably the most influential deck in the format for quite awhile. It's well-written, it looks good, and it will bring a lot more visibility to the archetype articles, which some people might not even be aware of. Let me know what the rest of you think. Thanks. --[[User:Politoed666|<span style="color:#00B7EB">''P''</span> <span style="color:#008080">''o''</span>]] [[User talk:Politoed666|<span style="color:#0095B6">''L''</span> <span style="color:#00CCCC">''i''</span>]] 02:47, 16 November 2010 (UTC) | * Nominating as an FAC candidate. Perhaps nominating your own article is frowned upon, but LuxChomp is a huge deal in the TCG right now, and has been arguably the most influential deck in the format for quite awhile. It's well-written, it looks good, and it will bring a lot more visibility to the archetype articles, which some people might not even be aware of. Let me know what the rest of you think. Thanks. --[[User:Politoed666|<span style="color:#00B7EB">''P''</span> <span style="color:#008080">''o''</span>]] [[User talk:Politoed666|<span style="color:#0095B6">''L''</span> <span style="color:#00CCCC">''i''</span>]] 02:47, 16 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:::Have you ever gone to [[:Category:Featured articles|the category listing them all?]] It isn't a matter of time: once they are featured, they are classified that way for life. ''[[User:Maverick Nate|<sup style="color:#00008B;">'''Maverick'''</sup>]][[User talk:Maverick Nate|<sub style="color:#00008B;">'''Nate'''</sub>]]'' 21:06, 17 November 2010 (UTC) | :::Have you ever gone to [[:Category:Featured articles|the category listing them all?]] It isn't a matter of time: once they are featured, they are classified that way for life. ''[[User:Maverick Nate|<sup style="color:#00008B;">'''Maverick'''</sup>]][[User talk:Maverick Nate|<sub style="color:#00008B;">'''Nate'''</sub>]]'' 21:06, 17 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
* I agree with Poli and Pokemaster. It is written really well and has enough pictures<small>{{tt|✱|...although Uxie and Garchomp probably should be English versions.}}</small>----'''''無限の知性''''' ◎ [[User:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#BF0B17">ＤＥＮＮＯＵ</font>]]'''[[Special:Random|◆]]'''[[User talk:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#1250A6">ＺＥＮＳＨＩ</font>]] 14:49, 16 November 2010 (UTC) | * I agree with Poli and Pokemaster. It is written really well and has enough pictures<small>{{tt|✱|...although Uxie and Garchomp probably should be English versions.}}</small>----'''''無限の知性''''' ◎ [[User:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#BF0B17">ＤＥＮＮＯＵ</font>]]'''[[Special:Random|◆]]'''[[User talk:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#1250A6">ＺＥＮＳＨＩ</font>]] 14:49, 16 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
*Great article. The TCG has been neglected to some extent and this is what we need more of. [[User:Arceus97|Arceus97]] 19:45, 1 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
====Object (4)==== | ====Object (4)==== | ||
<!--Please remember to update the count along with your vote.--> | <!--Please remember to update the count along with your vote.--> | ||