443
edits
Talk:Pikachu (Pokémon)/Featured article candidate: Difference between revisions
Talk:Pikachu (Pokémon)/Featured article candidate (view source)
Revision as of 18:10, 16 October 2010
, 16 October 2010→Object (3)
m (→Object (3)) |
|||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
*Not much better than any other Pokémon article. --[[User:Maxim|Maxim]] 13:06, 16 October 2010 (UTC) | *Not much better than any other Pokémon article. --[[User:Maxim|Maxim]] 13:06, 16 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
:But it's longer and more comprehensive, plus it's quite representative of the franchise as a whole. --[[User:AndyPKMN|Andy<sup>P</sup><sub>K</sub><sup>M</sup><sub>N</sub>]] 16:23, 16 October 2010 (UTC) | :But it's longer and more comprehensive, plus it's quite representative of the franchise as a whole. --[[User:AndyPKMN|Andy<sup>P</sup><sub>K</sub><sup>M</sup><sub>N</sub>]] 16:23, 16 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
:I agree with Andy. This article may be similar to the other Pokémon articles but it has a much higher quality than the rest. I am somewhat surprised that it has never been nominated to be a FA before but than again everyone does have their own opinion and I recognize that.--[[User:Alex726|<font color="#7D7D7D">'''Alex'''</font><font color="#000000">'''726'''</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Alex726|<font color="#007100">'''cont</font><font color="#DF0000">ribu</font><font color="#0000A0">tions'''</font>]]</sub> 18:10, 16 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
====Other comments==== | ====Other comments==== | ||