79
edits
Talk:Pikachu (Pokémon)/Featured article candidate: Difference between revisions
Talk:Pikachu (Pokémon)/Featured article candidate (view source)
Revision as of 06:07, 12 October 2010
, 12 October 2010→Support (5)
m (→Object (2): Please remember to update the count along with your vote.) |
Gagaromamah (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==[[Pikachu (Pokémon)]]==__NOTOC__ | ==[[Pikachu (Pokémon)]]==__NOTOC__ | ||
====Support ( | ====Support (6)==== | ||
<!--Please remember to update the count along with your vote.--> | <!--Please remember to update the count along with your vote.--> | ||
*This is an extremely detailed and accurate article. Bulbapedia needs a Pokémon species article as a FA because that's what Bulbapedia is all about. What better Pokémon to represent Bulbapedia than the most well known of them all, Pikachu?--[[User:Alex726|<font color="#7D7D7D">'''Alex'''</font><font color="#000000">'''726'''</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Alex726|<font color="#007100">'''cont</font><font color="#DF0000">ribu</font><font color="#0000A0">tions'''</font>]]</sub> 02:18, 9 October 2010 (UTC) | *This is an extremely detailed and accurate article. Bulbapedia needs a Pokémon species article as a FA because that's what Bulbapedia is all about. What better Pokémon to represent Bulbapedia than the most well known of them all, Pikachu?--[[User:Alex726|<font color="#7D7D7D">'''Alex'''</font><font color="#000000">'''726'''</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Alex726|<font color="#007100">'''cont</font><font color="#DF0000">ribu</font><font color="#0000A0">tions'''</font>]]</sub> 02:18, 9 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*I have to agree, I say it deserves to be one (I mean it is the "unofficial" mascot....) [[User:Ataro|Ataro]] 22:57, 9 October 2010 (UTC) | *I have to agree, I say it deserves to be one (I mean it is the "unofficial" mascot....) [[User:Ataro|Ataro]] 22:57, 9 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
*I agree with all of the above. This is a very organised and well written article. There's tons of great trivia and it's about time a pokémon article got a FA. [[User:Pokemaster97|Pokemaster97]] 18:48, 10 October 2010 (UTC) | *I agree with all of the above. This is a very organised and well written article. There's tons of great trivia and it's about time a pokémon article got a FA. [[User:Pokemaster97|Pokemaster97]] 18:48, 10 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
*Altough I think the trivia section is a little messy. I'm for.--[[User:Gagaromamah | <span style="color:#DAA520">''Gaga''</span>]][[User talk:Gagaromamah|<span style="color:#C0C0C0">romamah</span>]], Your Little Monster 06:07, 12 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
====Object (3)==== | ====Object (3)==== | ||