Talk:Pikachu (Pokémon)/Featured article candidate: Difference between revisions

Line 8: Line 8:
*This ''is'' my first time voting, so I could be wrong, but I can't see anything disqualifying about this article. --[[User talk:Venomoth|☯ ]][[User:Venomoth|*Ɣℯ№ӎօṫհ*]][[User talk:Venomoth| ☯]] 19:56, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
*This ''is'' my first time voting, so I could be wrong, but I can't see anything disqualifying about this article. --[[User talk:Venomoth|☯ ]][[User:Venomoth|*Ɣℯ№ӎօṫհ*]][[User talk:Venomoth| ☯]] 19:56, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
*I have to agree, I say it deserves to be one (I mean it is the "unofficial" mascot....) [[User:Ataro|Ataro]] 22:57, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
*I have to agree, I say it deserves to be one (I mean it is the "unofficial" mascot....) [[User:Ataro|Ataro]] 22:57, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
*I agree with all of the above. This is a very organised and well written article. There's tons of great triva and it's about time a pokémon article got a FA. [[User:Pokemaster97|Pokemaster97]] 18:48, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
*I agree with all of the above. This is a very organised and well written article. There's tons of great trivia and it's about time a pokémon article got a FA. [[User:Pokemaster97|Pokemaster97]] 18:48, 10 October 2010 (UTC)


====Object (2)====
====Object (2)====